I told you I loved you in a thrift store, and you didn't take it so well back then. You paused, didn't respond, and told me on the car ride back that you had to think about it, that it wasn't really the best time or place. Then things got bad, and we fought a lot. You, making me sad. And me, making you angry and hurt that you had to, couldn't help but, make me sad. And eventually we made a deal to be friends; even shook on it by the railroad tracks. Put it there, pal. Friends. Which is what we were before, actually. And then, a few weeks later, when you were drunk and sitting next to me on a sidewalk, you told me you loved me too. And we walked back to my place, stopping traffic on the way to make out in the intersection.
Then it was long distance and we didn't want to do "this" anymore. And secretly I was relieved because this relationship was hardly ever public. We were both hiding it in case it didn't work out. But we were always volatile, secretive, and tenuous in the best of circumstances, you and me.
After all this time I want to say that I'm still glad I said it, even amid the second-hand jeans and cheap DVDs, because it was pretty brave to love you.
---
What it's like to be cheated on:
Well first of all, it sucks. like totally sucks. like, really, totally, sucks.
Then you feel stupid and worthless for not knowing, and knowing all along, and wishing that there was something you could've done. Knowing how stupid it is to think that thought, but thinking it all the same. feeling the blame.
And then, like Emily Dickinson said, "after great pain a formal feeling comes" and you simply distance yourself from it. Like the distance you feel in meeting a stranger, saying, "Pleased to meet you, Mr. Collins."
---
Both of those things are stories. Just that: stories; short snapshots of a situation. I've posted them in an effort to just be honest with "who I am" as a person who writes. So, even though they came out of my head, I don't want people prying into it too far to find the innermost secrets of my psyche. I'm way more than a couple sad-sack blog posts, and I hope that you know that. I just heard an interview with
Ben Gibbard on NPR's World Cafe in which he talked about from where his best writing comes. He hinted that even when your topic is dark, sad, or personal it doesn't mean that you are a dark, sad, or deeply secretive person. He finds separation from it when he writes. I like that. He phrased it in terms of being "up" and "down", but it spoke to me more in terms of authorial control, and this is part of the reason I posted those entries.
The other reason is that I've been struggling to publish stuff recently, even before I was inspired to write this blog by Charlie McDonnel. Take Facebook for instance. I've become increasingly worried about who will see posts, and if they'll like it. I'm worried that the relationships I have will be changed because I post something political, or that I'm sharing too much. I'm worried it's annoying those that I respect. This feeling is part of a want to be able to control your perception of me through the things I share. It's terrifying to put things -and your
self- out there for the fear that you will judge me. I know how cliche that sounds, but it's true, and that's why it became a cliche in the first place. It once had truth and was powerful enough to become disseminated to the point of exhaustion.
Also, I don't want any of the "be yourself" bullshit that people always offer in situations like this. Because who the hell
am I, anyway? I don't know. I've been making it all up as I go. I think we all do.
It's possible the solution, and a better way to go about this situation, is with the "fuck it" mentality. Please excuse the vulgarity, but if I'm worried about posting a pro-Obama facebook status, writing something sad, loving somebody who might not love me back-- well, fuck it.
But that mentality doesn't take into account the real impacts of audience. Putting the self you're creating
out there for other people changes things in a real and tangible way. You no longer have control over how it's going to be perceived, which is both unfair and a reality we have to deal with. I have plenty of friends whom I love and respect whom I don't want to upset, or have think less of me because of carelessness in their construction of me. I know that I struggle with it too, but it's hard to give people the complexity that you garner for yourself. It's hard to imagine other people's feelings as as real and immediate as your own because we don't get to experience everything they experience. When I interact with someone, whether it's on the internet, phone, or in person, I'm allowing them to create their own version of me inside their heads, largely without my permission. And what if they get it wrong, misconstrue it? It worries me and I try to manipulate the way in which they see me in order to reflect the way I want to be seen. Does that make me manipulative or sensitive to other people's perceptions.
In trying to grapple with this issue of the right balance between reservation and expression, I'm finding it hard not to speak in cliches: "we all feel this", "we all do that", but I think I may have stumbled upon a few truths which I'm trying to adopt now. And out of it I've found a new mantra:
Be Brave. Live. It's premised on the fact that we feel lonely inside our heads, but are scared to let our thoughts be witnessed. The way I see it, being scared is far preferable to being lonely. You can grow comfortable being scared, but loneliness will continue to gnaw at you until there isn't much left to share.
So, that's my advice.
Be brave. Live. It is preferable to be scared and do it anyway, than to be confined to the loneliness of creating for no-one. Don't be like Emily, whom I quoted earlier, and whom created only for herself, but by some lucky chance of ours we got to witness it anyway. Create your
self , and for yourself, but share it.
This has been a response to
Charlieissocoollike,
Hank Green,
Ze Frank, and
Micheal Aranda: